Landfills, Nuclear and Toxic Waste

Pickens County MMR

SCELP is representing Pickens County and its citizens in fighting for health, safety, and self-determination in relation to coal ash.
Support Our Work

Case Background

Pickens County had worked closely with a landfill company over a period of years to develop and approve a plan for construction of a “class 2” landfill, so that local citizens and businesses would have a place to dispose of materials from land clearing, yard work, and construction, such as: brush and limbs, logs, rock, masonry, glass, and pipes.

Disposal of these relatively innocuous materials is consistent with the plan Pickens County has developed for solid waste disposal. However, unbeknownst to the County or anyone residing therein, the landfill company and DHEC began meeting surreptitiously to modify the landfill plan to allow coal ash disposal. DHEC eventually approved significant modifications to the landfill design and operation, clearing the way for the landfill to accept much more hazardous wastes. Most startlingly, DHEC agreed with the landfill company’s proposal to categorize these landfill modifications as “minor,” meaning that no public notice or opportunity for participation was provided.

In short, this former “class 2” landfill was modified to accept coal ash without any notice being provided to Pickens County, neighboring property owners, or other concerned citizens. The original landfill design underwent an extensive public notice and publication process, but the controversial and dangerous change was hidden.

Coal Ash is controversial and dangerous due to its propensity to create dust, its propensity to contain toxic substances, and its propensity to contaminate groundwater and surface water.


Why Is This Important?

Coal ash contains toxic chemicals, such as mercury, lead, and arsenic. It is a known carcinogen and is highly soluable in water, which causes leaching and water contamination issues. In addition to water contamination, disposal of coal ash can also lead to tiny coal ash particles blowing up into the atmosphere and then being inhaled by nearby populations. Obviously no one in proximity of this proposed landfill thinks there is anything “minor” about the addition of coal ash disposal.

When Pickens County found out about the permit modification, months after it had been mailed to just the landfill company, the County filed suit along with adjacent property owners. However, their case was dismissed by the Administrative Law Court (ALC) on the basis that it was not filed within the short window for challenging permit decisions after they are issued. In other words, under the ALC’s decision, the landfill modifications are shielded from challenge because DHEC and the landfill company kept the public from knowing about them.

SCELP has taken over the appeal of this timeliness decision and is asking the S.C. Court of Appeals not to reward this deceptive course of action.

After filing a notice of appeal and our initial brief, we filed our reply brief on November 16, 2017. The main issue in this case is that by classifying the permit modification as “minor” and ignoring some other laws, DHEC and MRR excluded the public, the County and other interested parties from the modification process completely. Thus, our claim is that the modification is illegal and void pursuant to law, and that the case cannot be dismissed as untimely.

On January 8, 2020, the S.C. Court of Appeals reversed the lower court's decision and sent the case back to the Administrative Law Court. The Court of Appeals' reversal rests on its conclusion that DHEC misclassified the permit modification in a manner that denied Pickens County and the neighbors of the notice they were due. In short, the County and the neighbors could not be held to a timeliness standard when they were never properly notified of the permit.

This was a major win for Pickens County and the health, safety and self-determination of its citizens!

Case Update

The South Carolina Supreme Court issued a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' decision. Oral arguments are scheduled for May 25, 2021.

Read the full story

News & Press Releases

Contact Us

Do you have any questions?

Email

Additional Resources

No Related files.
All rights reserved 2021.